top of page

Non Compete Agreements Ruled Illegal

Writer: Mary DavisMary Davis





In a significant move to promote competition and protect the rights of workers, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced a final rule banning noncompete agreements nationwide. This new rule aims to ensure that workers have the freedom to change jobs, start new businesses, and bring new ideas to market without being hindered by restrictive contractual conditions.


Noncompete agreements have long been a common practice in many industries, often preventing workers from seeking new opportunities or starting their own businesses. These agreements can have detrimental effects on workers, including keeping wages low, stifling innovation, and limiting job mobility. With an estimated 30 million workers in the U.S. currently bound by noncompetes, the FTC's decision to ban these agreements is a significant step towards promoting a more competitive and dynamic economy.


Under the new rule, existing non compete agreements for the vast majority of workers will no longer be enforceable. This means that workers will no longer be restricted from pursuing new job opportunities or starting their own businesses. While existing non compete agreements for senior executives will still be allowed, employers are prohibited from entering into new noncompete agreements with senior executives. Employers will also be required to provide notice to workers bound by existing noncompetes that these agreements will not be enforced against them in the future.


The FTC estimates that the ban on non competes will lead to the creation of over 8,500 new businesses each year, resulting in higher earnings for workers and lower healthcare costs. Additionally, the ban is expected to drive innovation, with an estimated increase in patents filed each year. By removing barriers to job mobility and entrepreneurship, the FTC's rule is poised to have a positive impact on the economy and the workforce.


In response to public feedback received during the rulemaking process, the FTC carefully considered the implications of banning non compete agreements and made adjustments to the final rule. The Commission found that non compete agreements are unfair methods of competition that inhibit efficient labor market matching and hinder innovation. By eliminating noncompetes, employers will be encouraged to compete on the merits for workers' labor services, leading to improved working conditions and wages.


Employers have several alternatives to noncompetes that still enable them to protect their investments, such as trade secret laws and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). These alternatives provide a way for employers to safeguard proprietary information without restricting workers' job opportunities. The FTC encourages employers to consider these alternatives as a means of protecting their interests while promoting a more competitive and innovative economy.


The final rule will become effective 120 days after publication in the Federal Register, giving employers and workers time to adjust to the new requirements. Market participants can report suspected violations of the rule to the Bureau of Competition, ensuring that the ban on non competes is enforced effectively.The FTC's decision to ban non compete agreements is a significant step towards promoting competition, innovation, and worker freedom. By eliminating barriers to job mobility and entrepreneurship, the rule is expected to have a positive impact on the economy and the workforce. Employers are encouraged to comply with the new requirements and explore alternative ways to protect their investments while fostering a more competitive and dynamic labor market. 


You can read the full text of the FTC’s Final Rule here.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page